DuetsBlog Collaborations in Creativity & the Law

Monthly Archives: September 2009

Don’t Underestimate the Power of a Logo and Other Distinguishable Matter

Posted in Almost Advice

Yesterday, Under Consideration’s Brand New Blog discussed the redesign of the Nickelodeon trademark. Nickelodeon has decided to drop the well known splat design that encapsulated the NICKELODEON term. As reported by Under Consideration, Nickelodeon’s “splat” has existed in one form or another for over 15 years. Although the orange “splat” has evolved over the years, it was a… Continue Reading

The P-Word

Posted in Branding, Guest Bloggers, Marketing, Trademarks

It’s a jungle out there in corporate America. A hot, steamy, ardent, passionate jungle. You’ve seen the evidence. Whole Foods is hiring “people with a passion for healthy living.” Bose seeks “people with a passion for innovation.” The South Florida Water Management District wants “good people with a passion for water.” Grant Thornton is looking… Continue Reading

Kleenex® Not Wanting to Blow It: Some Steps to Avoid Trademark Genericide

Posted in Advertising, Branding, Famous Marks, Genericide, Loss of Rights, Marketing, Trademarks

This sponsored banner ad is currently appearing in AdAge’s Daily News on-line newsletter: How many boxes of tissue do you suppose this ad is responsible for selling? If the answer is none, that is probably fine with Kimberly-Clark since the return on investment for this ad is measured quite differently, I’m sure, given how the frequently misused Kleenex®… Continue Reading

Holiday Inn’s Relaunch: Do We Have a Problem, Houston?

Posted in Advertising, Branding, Look-For Ads, Trademarks

Time for me to play dumb consumer and ask an honest question.  What is the conventional wisdom in relaunching or revitalizing a brand:  do you tell consumers that you’re doing it, or not?  I suspect that there is no universal answer, but Holiday Inn’s "relaunch" has admittedly caught my attention.  (It caught Steve’s attention here.) … Continue Reading

From Trademark to Tin God: Long Live the King?

Posted in Advertising, Branding, Food, Genericide, Loss of Rights, Marketing, Television, Trademarks

A few years ago, the world was introduced to arguably the creepiest fast food mascot of all time: The King.  For many of us, this introduction came courtesy of a frightening commercial suggesting that we "Wake Up With The King."  Over the following years, TK expanded his popularity.  He went from our bedrooms to our… Continue Reading

Who’s Your Patty? or Where’s Who’s Your Patty?

Posted in Advertising, Branding, Dilution, Domain Names, Food, Infringement, Law Suits, Marketing, Trademarks

As promised, here are some additional thoughts (beyond the very frank and practical non-legal advice already shared by Jason Voiovich) about Lion’s Tap’s trademark infringement case against McDonald’s over the "Who’s Your Patty?" slogan. Here’s the multi-million dollar question: What did McDonald’s know and when did they know it? Those are questions likely to get a lot of… Continue Reading

Genericide Watch: Frisbee, Hula Hoop, Slip ‘N Slide, and Super Ball

Posted in Genericide

Wham-O, Inc. has had its share of hits over the years, achieving "household name" status (my opinion) with an impressive list of trademarked (I am not afraid to use it as a verb) products: FRISBEE for "toy flying saucers for toss games" HULA HOOP for "plastic toy hoops" SUPER BALL for "sport and toy balls" SLIP ‘N SLIDE for a "flexible plastic water slide"… Continue Reading

Supreme Court Asked to Review Washington Redskins Trademark Case

Posted in Advertising, Branding, First Amendment, Law Suits, Marketing, Trademarks, TTAB

Back in May, I wrote a piece entitled "Re-Branding Madness in Washington" Overlooks Obvious: The Washington Redskins," discussing the trademark cancellation action that I filed on behalf of seven prominent Native American leaders back in September 1992 (Harjo et al v. Pro-Football, Inc.), and calling for the football team to "hire a branding guru to engage… Continue Reading

What Does “Trademarked” Mean to You?

Posted in Marketing, Trademarks

               More than a few trademark types cringe when their clients or others say things like "let’s trademark it," "they didn’t trademark their logo," or "we don’t want to trademark this name," and, when they ask questions like "is it trademarked?" or "is that trademarked software?" or "did we ever trademark our logo?" or "should we… Continue Reading

Toys “R” Us, Indeed

Posted in Branding, Domain Names, Trademarks

A couple of weeks ago, news reports came out that KB Toys, which had filed for bankruptcy in December, sold its trademarks and domain names to a company called CE Stores LLC for $2.1 million.  Last week, Toys "R" Us disclosed that it owns CE Stores.  While this may be somewhat unremarkable, consider that Toys "R"… Continue Reading

News Flash: Dilbert on “Trademark Infringement Lawyers”

Posted in Infringement, Law Suits, Squirrelly Thoughts, Trademarks

Clients and friends have enjoyed passing yesterday’s Dilbert cartoon on to me, just for fun (I think). So, for those of you who weren’t sure we could take not only a lawyer joke, but a "trademark infringement lawyer" joke, read on: Having said that, I think we already demonstrated our ability to self-deprecate with the best… Continue Reading

Counting By Numbers, or Stripes? A Likelihood of Confusion Tale.

Posted in Branding, Domain Names, Infringement, Law Suits, Marketing, Trademarks

     When it comes to scope of rights and trademark enforcement, as a trademark type, it’s hard not to admire Adidas’ success in preventing the use of two, three, and four stripes, when its long-standing federally-registered design mark consists of three stripes. At least in the U.S., Adidas appears to have gained a one… Continue Reading

Good Luxo

Posted in Branding, Counterfeits, Dilution, Fair Use, Law Suits, Loss of Rights, Product Configurations

Luxo AS, a Norwegian light manufacturer and distributor, has sued Disney and Pixar et. al. asserting various trademark-related claims arising from Disney’s and Pixar’s use of the LUXO trademark.  In an always interesting case of trademark law/branding meets fair use, Luxo has alleged that Disney/Pixar’s use of "Luxo Jr." to identify the "hopping lamp," which has been the corporate mascot of Pixar… Continue Reading

Lion’s Tap Shouldn’t Have Sued. At Least Not So Soon.

Posted in Advertising, Almost Advice, Branding, Food, Guest Bloggers, Infringement, Law Suits, Marketing, Trademarks

A brief study in how the Lion’s Tap could have had its burger and eaten it too. I have to say, in the interest of full disclosure, I have an irrational love for the Lion’s Tap. Ever since I worked in Eden Prairie back in the 1990s, I’ve been hooked. Fast forward the better part of… Continue Reading