DuetsBlog Collaborations in Creativity & the Law

Category Archives: Famous Marks

Subscribe to Famous Marks RSS Feed

No Budding in Line Washington Redskins

Posted in Branding, Famous Marks, Marketing, Mixed Bag of Nuts, Trademarks

In a case with special significance to our DuetsBlog crew (our founder Steve Baird started the fight to cancel the THE REDSKINS trademark registrations in 1992 – see more about the Harjo case here) and significant to trademark practitioners and owners alike, the federal government is asking the United States Supreme Court to deny the… Continue Reading

The Hashtag / Trademark Paradox: #Trending, but #Proprietary?

Posted in Advertising, Branding, Famous Marks, First Amendment, Infringement, Marketing, Social Media, Social Networking

As the hustle and bustle of the INTA 2016 Annual Meeting drew to a close yesterday, I reflected on the session “#HASHTAGS #EverythingYouNeedToKnow” from Tuesday. It seems trademark protection may not (yet) fit comfortably into the hashtag world. DuetsBlog previously provided a helpful tutorial on the nuts and bolts of hashtags and how they function, particularly on the sites Twitter and… Continue Reading

Are Registrations for Product Configuration Trademarks for Suckers?

Posted in Fair Use, Famous Marks, Food, Idea Protection, Infringement, Non-Traditional Trademarks, Product Configurations, Trademarks, USPTO

As a kid, I loved candy. But as an adult, who happens to be an intellectual property attorney, I still love candy. So you can bet your sweet tooth that I was feeling a sugar rush when I came across a pending application to register the claimed mark shown below: The application was filed by… Continue Reading

Energizer Bunny to Drain Duracell’s Battery?

Posted in Advertising, Agreements, Articles, Branding, Contracts, Dilution, Famous Marks, Goodwill, Infringement, Law Suits, Marketing, Non-Traditional Trademarks, Trademarks

When I first heard last week about a trademark infringement lawsuit between Energizer and Duracell over pink bunny icons, my first thought was, Duracell is The Copper Top battery brand, what would motivate Duracell and how could Duracell possibly believe it had the legal right to use a pink bunny character in advertising and on… Continue Reading

Does Louis Vuitton’s Loss to a Parody Defense Justify an Award of Attorney Fees?

Posted in Dilution, Fair Use, Famous Marks, Fashion, First Amendment, Infringement, Law Suits, Trademark Bullying, Trademarks

Earlier this month the Southern District of New York granted the defendant’s Motion for Summary in Louis Vuitton Malletier, S.A. v. My Other Bag , Inc. The fashion giant had brought suit against a California company over its sales of a canvas tote bag that included an image that “evoked” Louis Vuitton’s classic handbag design…. Continue Reading

Louis Vuitton’s Other Lawsuit Was a Winner, but Loses to a Parody Defense – Again.

Posted in Dilution, Fair Use, Famous Marks, First Amendment, Infringement

Louis Vuitton is no stranger to trademark disputes. As a a manufacturer of handbags, wallets, and other luxury goods, the company has its hands full just addressing counterfeit products. However, like any other company, there is concern not just with “fakes,” but other products and services that may otherwise infringe or dilute Louis Vuitton’s trademark… Continue Reading

Snoop Dogg’s Branded Cannabis Among the First, But the Stakes Will Get Higher

Posted in Advertising, Branding, Famous Marks, Guest Bloggers, Marketing, Mixed Bag of Nuts, Trademarks, USPTO

–Jason Voiovich, Chief Customer Officer, Logic PD Who among you is surprised that Snoop Dogg was among the first to create his own marijuana brand? Or that the distinguished list of early entrants includes Willie Nelson and Melissa Etheridge? Like me, you are probably not shocked. Recreational marijuana is “legal” in four states. Medicinal use… Continue Reading

Bright Bulbs Bring Bank Branding Battle

Posted in Advertising, Agreements, Articles, Branding, Famous Marks, Marketing, Technology, Television, Trademarks

Just as the Minnesota Vikings exceed expectations this year and push into the NFL playoffs, the Vikings’ still-unfinished new stadium is producing some interesting (if not expected) branding-related litigation. A major topic of conversation here in the Twin Cities is the 2016 opening of U.S. Bank Stadium, the Vikings’ new home built on the site… Continue Reading

PATRÓN Tequila Bottle Design Enforcement?

Posted in Advertising, Articles, Branding, Dilution, Famous Marks, Infringement, Marketing, Non-Traditional Trademarks, Product Packaging, Sight, Trademarks, TTAB, USPTO

When we write about non-traditional trademark enforcement here on DuetsBlog, we almost always are referring to the protection of non-traditional marks like product configurations, product containers, product packaging, color marks, scent marks, tactile marks, and other non-verbal indications of source for a product or service. But, today we’re adding a little twist to our normal… Continue Reading

Imitating MILANO Cookies? Pepperidge Farm Remembers.

Posted in Articles, Branding, Dilution, Fair Use, Famous Marks, Food, Infringement, Look-For Ads, Marketing, Non-Traditional Trademarks, Product Configurations, Product Packaging, Taste, Trademarks, USPTO

When a company puts “DISTINCTIVE” on its own packaging, its usually a sign that it highly values its trade dress and product configuration rights. That’s certainly the case for Pepperidge Farm and its Milano cookies. The commercial bakery giant has taken aim at Trader Joe’s, the popular grocery chain, for selling house-branded “Crispy Cookies” that… Continue Reading

Technology and Trademark Tantrums

Posted in Advertising, Fair Use, Famous Marks, Food, Guest Bloggers, Infringement, Law Suits, Mixed Bag of Nuts, Technology, Trademarks

– Draeke Weseman, Weseman Law Office, PLLC Things that can potentially upset people can also really benefit a lot of people. —Aktarer Zaman, Founder of Skiplagged Last week, Tim wrote a great post about a recent lawsuit filed by In-N-Out Burger against DoorDash, a food delivery startup. DoorDash is an on-demand delivery service that allows… Continue Reading

It’s Not Delivery, It’s Infringement.

Posted in Fair Use, Famous Marks, First Amendment, Goodwill, Infringement, Social Media, Trademarks

We’re not talking pizza, we’re talking burgers. Not just any burgers, either, we’re talking In-N-Out burgers. As any California transplant will tell you, no other burger from any other restaurant comes close. In-N-Out has more than just burgers; it also has French fries, shakes, and drinks. They also have a drive-thru if you don’t want… Continue Reading

The TAKE YO PANTIES OFF Argument

Posted in Famous Marks, First Amendment, Law Suits, Loss of Rights, Mixed Bag of Nuts, Trademarks, TTAB

  In appealing the cancellation of six trademarks, the Washington Redskins filed their opening brief in the Fourth Circuit this week.  Cancellation of the team’s REDSKINS trademarks was upheld by a federal district court in July.  The marks were deemed “disparaging” under Section 2(a) of the Lanham Act, which denies trademark protection to marks that… Continue Reading

Will Purple Reign, as a Color Trademark?

Posted in Advertising, Articles, Branding, Counterfeits, Dilution, False Advertising, Famous Marks, FDA Approval, International, Law Suits, Look-For Ads, Marketing, Non-Traditional Trademarks, Sight, Trademarks

Today, we’re not talking about that Purple Rain, that Color Purple, or those Purple People Eaters, and we’re especially not talking today about Purple Gloves, Purple Bags, Purple Jackets, Purple Candy Wrappers, or Purple Tags, no today, we’re talking about “The Purple Pill,” a/k/a Today’s Purple Pill — AstraZeneca’s blockbuster Nexium brand acid reflux medication…. Continue Reading

Bud…Bud-WINE-Err?

Posted in Advertising, Branding, Famous Marks, Trademarks, TTAB, USPTO

You might be familiar with the popular mid-90s commercials suggested by the title of this post.  However, the intention of this post is about the use of trademarks on beer to refuse trademark protection for wineries and vice versa, which is an increasing problem for the growing craft alcohol industry. Recently an Austrailian company, Innvopak… Continue Reading

The Clinton Trademark Clause?

Posted in Famous Marks, Infringement, Squirrelly Thoughts, Trademarks

At this early stage in the 2016 election cycle, it’s difficult to predict much of anything, but if Hillary Clinton wins the Democratic nomination and, ultimately, the presidency, I can say for certain it will have an unprecedented effect on a lesser-known quirk of trademark law. Many practitioners and laypersons are familiar with the provisions… Continue Reading

The Board Lends a Blow to Celebrities

Posted in Famous Marks, Fashion, Marketing, Mixed Bag of Nuts, Technology, Trademarks, TTAB

The celebrity known as will.i.am from the musical group the Black Eyed Peas sought to register three marks for “I AM” in connection with cosmetics, cell phones, artificial eyelashes, sunglasses, and brass wrist cuff bracelets, among other goods. In three precedential opinions,the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (“Board”) refused to register these marks based on… Continue Reading

When Brands Get Personal, Do They Lose Their Identity?

Posted in Advertising, Branding, Famous Marks, Marketing, Non-Traditional Trademarks, Product Packaging, Trademarks

Marketing has always been an exercise in getting consumers to make a connection with a brand.  As our friend Seth Godin once said “Marketing is no longer about the stuff that you make, but the story that you tell.”   With the widespread use of social media like Twitter, Facebook, and Instagram, those stories are… Continue Reading

Wanted: Brand Deputies at the MN State Fair

Posted in Articles, Branding, Copyrights, Dilution, Fair Use, Famous Marks, Infringement, Product Packaging, Trademarks

The Minnesota State Fair continues to provide endless blog fodder for those who care about intellectual property. Last week, we wrote about a State Fair vendor concerned about its claimed, but unarticulated “intellectual property.” This week is a good reminder that brand owners have a lot to be concerned about what goes on with their… Continue Reading

Tory Burch Protects Her Brand

Posted in Counterfeits, Famous Marks, Fashion, Infringement, Law Suits, Mixed Bag of Nuts, Trademarks

The barrage of counterfeit jewelry products bearing the “Isis Cross” will cease! After more than two years of battling with counterfeiters, Tory Burch, LLC and its subsidiary (“Tory Burch”) secured a $41 million judgment and permanent injunction against jewelry company Lin & J International, Inc. and its owners (“Lin & J”).   The judge found that… Continue Reading

Will Starbucks Be a Closer at the USPTO?

Posted in Advertising, Articles, Branding, Famous Marks, Food, Look-For Ads, Marketing, Non-Traditional Trademarks, Product Packaging, Sight, Trademarks, USPTO

We’ll soon see whether coffee truly goes hand in hand with closers, at least in one famous brand owner’s quest for registration of a non-verbal, non-traditional color trademark at the USPTO. I’ve been noticing Starbucks focus on green straws lately, with the door signage shown below, offering a pretty creative use of “look-for advertising” without… Continue Reading

A Smörgåsbord of Standard Characters

Posted in Advertising, Branding, Famous Marks, Marketing, Non-Traditional Trademarks, Trademarks

Strolling around the Mall of America last weekend, I was surprised not only by the rather low weekend crowds (everyone must have retreated to their respective lake cabin) but also the brand-new store for Swedish outdoor brand Fjällräven. What with my highly-attenuated Swedish ancestry, I couldn’t help but stop in. The company’s perhaps best known for its… Continue Reading