Are You Ready For Some Football (Ads)?

Well, even though the Vikings didn’t make it, I am still looking forward to the Super Bowl – for the commercials.  I am sure I am not alone in my excitement.  In fact, there are numerous Web sites dedicated to the best Super Bowl commercials, such as this one which chronicles them by decade.  Purchasing one of the coveted 30-second time slots can make or break (remember the controversial Just for Feet ad in 1999?) a brand.   

Estimated to be “the biggest TV audience in the world,” the Super Bowl presents a very unique opportunity for businesses to advertise.  Not only do they capture a huge audience (last year there were 95.4 million viewers the third most watched program of the year), but a captive audience who actually looks forward to the commercials rather than using that time to grab a snack or use the restroom. 

Even in this economy, the coveted time slots are selling fast.  According to Portfolio, Super Bowl ad sales started off slow, with only half of the slots sold six months ago.  However, it was recently reported that CBS has sold 95% of its 30-second spots, and the remaining spots will fill up fast. 

This year, a few of the reported purchasers of ad time include: 

  • Anheuser-Busch bought the most airtime and is the exclusive beer brewer for Super Bowl advertising;
  • CareerBuilder.com, who last year, in my opinion, had one of the best ads of all time (click here to view); and
  • Dr. Pepper, a first-timer to the Super Bowl, whose commercial is reported to include the band KISS. 

Stay tuned for more on the 2010 ads after the Super Bowl airs on February 7, 2010. 

Request Info

See our or enter your information below to send us a quick message and we'll reply in one business day or less.

Your privacy is ensured. We will never sell, disclose, or trade contact information.

False Advertising Claims on the Rise

There was a very interesting article in the New York Times this weekend worth reading - Best Soup Ever?  Suits Over Ads Now Seek Proof.

The article addresses several recent issues raised by companies against competitors over statements or claims being made in advertisements.  Specifically, companies are challenging the truth or implied truth in competitive ads in an attempt to get the ad withdrawn or changed.

Apparently, the number of complaints over advertisements with the National Advertising Division, as well as the number of false advertising lawsuits (under Section 43(a) of the Lanham Act) are up significantly.  Some interesting disputes from the article include:  

  • AT&T sued Verizon Wireless over an ad chart, claiming it falsely implied that AT&T had no cell phone coverage in the white area (rather than no 3G coverage):

The lawsuit attacks use of the chart in several commercials.  One great example, is Verizon's Island of Misfit Toys commercial.  In this holiday commercial, out-of-date toys have been banished to an island where Verizon sends one of AT&T’s new phones, due to its allegedly inadequate coverage.  On a related note, the National Advertising Division recently recommended that Sprint discontinue its use of the claim "Most Dependable 3G Network" due to a lack of sufficient support for the claim. 

  • Pantene attacked Dove’s claims that its conditioner repairs hair better.  According to the Times, Dove defended its claims with a market study and an expert to defend its use of “wet combing” versus “dry combing” technique.   Based upon a quick review of a few blogs, these two companies are in direct competition over solving the frizzies (for examples, see here and here). 

The Times article suggested defending such claims sometimes requires “delving into the minutiae” and raises the question of whether most consumers actually believe and/or rely on statements such as “no other dog food stacks up” or a hair care product that can really “repair hair better.”  Regardless, it is a great article for anyone interesting in marketing.