You may be interested to know that the American Intellectual Property Law Association (AIPLA) did file a timely response on January 7, 2011, to the USPTO’s original request for comments regarding whether "trademark bullying" is a significant problem deserving attention, see here. Hat tip to Jackie. Let’s just say, it is starting to become clear why the USPTO dropped the… Continue Reading
Tag Archives: IPO
Does Size Matter, When Identifying a “Trademark Bully”?
Posted in Counterfeits, Infringement, Law Suits, TrademarksWho says that being a large corporate trademark owner is one of the prerequisites to earning the emotionally-charged, pejorative, and ill-defined label "trademark bully"? Well, the original directive to the USPTO appears to assume that "trademark bullying" is a one-way street, disfavoring only large corporate trademark owners, and ignoring the possibility that individuals and small businesses are equally capable of deserving… Continue Reading
Trademark Bully Update: IPO Says Not a Problem
Posted in Famous Marks, Goodwill, Infringement, Law Suits, TrademarksThe Intellectual Property Owners Association (IPO) submitted its comments last Friday in response to the USPTO’s recent invitation for input on whether "trademark bullying" is a problem. In response to the USPTO’s key question "Do you think trademark ‘bullies’ are currently a problem for trademark owners, and if so, how significant is the problem?" IPO… Continue Reading









