—Dave Taylor, Taylor Brand Group Think of your favorite brands of clothing, beverages, restaurants, or insurance–any product or service you like and purchase. You could probably name two brands or more in every category in addition to competitive brands that you’ve chosen not to buy, or haven’t bothered to try. Take a little bit of… Continue Reading
Tag Archives: Motorola
Droid Does Poor Billboard Placement
Posted in Advertising, MarketingContinuing on my previous comments that the entity(-ies) responsible for the Droid phone (i.e. Verizorolagoogasfilm, or whatever the consortium of Verizon, Motorola, Google, and Lucasfilm is going by these days) are not necessarily following the "don’t be evil" motto, the billboard below, found along a very busy interstate, strikes me as poorly placed: Perhaps I’m… Continue Reading
Droid: An “Eye” Phone?
Posted in Advertising, Branding, Infringement, Marketing, TrademarksAs Steve has noted, I find it amusing that the Droid phone from Verizon licenses DROID from Lucasfilm Ltd. To my mind, the Droid "eye" theme is a poor imitation of another famous fantasy character: the Eye of Sauron, from Tolkien’s Lord of the Rings trilogy. When I see the Droid eye, I immediately hearken… Continue Reading
Likelihood of Confusion (As to What?)
Posted in Advertising, Agreements, Branding, Contracts, Famous Marks, Goodwill, Marketing, TrademarksWho is responsible for this billboard ad? Is it a Google advertisement? Verizon? Motorola? Droid? Whatever the answer, it helps make the point visually that trademarks require protection beyond mere confusion as to source; basically, the same point we made a while back (in response to Seth Godin’s trademark position and then during a friendly sparring match with Ron Coleman), as we discussed the breadth of the… Continue Reading









