A recent road trip in Texas flagged this roadside sign, depicting a likely famous non-verbal logo, standing all alone: So, I dug up this little gem from our archives to refresh my memory on what I had said about it before: Which Non-Verbal Logo Doesn’t Belong? Admittedly, I was skeptical about Starbucks’ move to extract the siren… Continue Reading
Tag Archives: Non-Verbal Logos
University of California Flushes New Logo
Posted in AlphaWatch, Branding, Guest Bloggers, Marketing, Social Networking, TrademarksSo, last Friday we covered this story: Critics Flush New University of California Logo. Now, we can report that the next morning, the Los Angeles Times wrote this story: Maligned UC Logo Shelved; “Time to Move On,” Officials Say. Putting aside any possible questions about cause and effect, is there a difference between flushing a… Continue Reading
Critics Flush New University of California Logo
Posted in AlphaWatch, Branding, Guest Bloggers, Marketing, Trademarks, TruncationHow about a little levity for your weekend preparations? There has been a great deal of discussion among those interested in the brand new and increasingly controversial University of California logo appearing on the right above. Mashable’s discussion of the online branding outrage is here. Berkeleyside coverage is here. And, News Fix coverage is here. Brian Williams even… Continue Reading
Will the Twitter Bird Fly Alone Some Day?
Posted in Branding, Famous Marks, Marketing, Non-Traditional Trademarks, Sight, Social Networking, TrademarksLast month William Lozito, over at Name Wire: The Product Naming Blog, reported on Twitter’s new bird logo, and the multitude of don’ts associated with the launch of it. Having so many don’ts seems a bit contrary to Twitter’s prior rather lax or laissez-faire approach to trademark enforcement,… Continue Reading
Red Bull Packaging Trade Dress Approved by USPTO
Posted in ArticlesTo assist in curbing the knock-off problem depicted above, Austrian-based Red Bull is on the move with its recent attempt to register — as a non-traditional trademark in the U.S. — the following design in connection with energy drinks, soft drinks, and sports drinks: Here is the description of the mark approved by the USPTO… Continue Reading
The Colonel or The Bell?
Posted in BrandingWhich brand do you believe is better equipped to enjoy the benefits of using a non-verbal logo? In other words, which brand can more easily shed the words from the visual identity, in the hopes of joining the ranks of these likely famous non-verbal logos and brand signals? My answer below the jump.
Webinar on Non-Traditional Trademarks, Sound, Color, Shape, Scent & More
Posted in Non-Traditional Trademarks, Product Configurations, Sight, Smell, Sound, Taste, Touch, TrademarksI’m happy to share with you that on Tuesday February 8, 2011, I’m speaking about one of my favorite topics, non-traditional trademarks, with my friends Linda McLeod of Finnegan Henderson and Stephen Feingold of Kilpatrick Townsend, in a webinar program put on by Strafford Publications, Inc. The webinar begins at 1:00 PM EST and Noon CST. Registration details… Continue Reading
A Famous Trademark That Casts a Very Long Shadow
Posted in Branding, Famous Marks, Law Suits, Marketing, TrademarksThis is the epitome of a famous non-verbal logo and trademark that truly can stand alone (we have discussed others too): Hat tip to John Welch over at the TTABlog who did a very nice write up on this interesting decision: Apple, Inc. v. Echospin, LLC. Basically, the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office… Continue Reading
Judging A Brand By Its Cover
Posted in Branding, Marketing, TrademarksI’m mostly wearing my consumer hat today, having just returned from a youth baseball tournament in Phoenix this past weekend, where we stayed at the six month new Drury Inn & Suites shown above. As you may recall, and if so, you will have noticed the irony because, last September I riffed about the Drury name and asked whether a… Continue Reading
Lightning Strikes How Many Times?
Posted in Branding, Sight, TrademarksI have heard that lightning only strikes once in the same place, but apparently that is only a myth. Indeed, the number of lightning bolt logos that have "hit" the mail room, over the years, at the U.S. Trademark Office appear to provide additional evidence for disproving the popular myth. So, what does that say, if anything, about the… Continue Reading
Branding Exclamations!
Posted in Advertising, Branding, Food, International, Marketing, Non-Traditional Trademarks, TrademarksCan you name the owner of this exclamation mark branding signal? You may be surprised to learn it is federally-registered in the U.S. as a stand-alone non-verbal trademark. You may be even more surprised to learn, it was federally-registered without a showing of secondary meaning or acquired distinctiveness, because it was viewed as an inherently distinctive… Continue Reading
Chief Wahoo ≠ Louis Sockalexis
Posted in Advertising, Branding, Marketing, TrademarksLast week I blogged about how the Cleveland Indians could save some face by re-branding Chief Wahoo: Turns out there are some who believe that Chief Wahoo is a "tribute" to or the logo actually pays "homage" to Louis Sockalexis, who Baseball Almanac has reported to be professional baseball’s first American Indian player. He apparently played for… Continue Reading






