Coca-Cola settled on its famous contour bottle design almost 100 years ago, in 1916, after several years of trials with other far less distinctive shapes (at least under today’s standards): Federal trademark registration data confirms the first use date to be July 8, 1916. The description of the contour bottle design mark in 1960 was: “The… Continue Reading
Category Archives: Sight
Subscribe to Sight RSS FeedIt’s Raining Fluid Trademarks
Posted in Advertising, Branding, Guest Bloggers, Marketing, Non-Traditional Trademarks, Sight, TrademarksSo-called “fluid” trademarks are gaining a recent downpour of attention – on Monday INTA wrote about them in the Daily News distributed in Dallas at INTA’s 135th Annual Meeting, it also held a panel discussion on the topic the same date (we’ll have more about that next week), and just yesterday guest-blogger Jason Voiovich provided an insightful marketer’s… Continue Reading
Rapala Billboard Ads Continue to Engage
Posted in Advertising, Branding, Marketing, Non-Traditional Trademarks, Patents, Product Configurations, Search Engines, Sight, Trademarks, USPTOIt’s that time of year again. The fishing opener in Minnesota is upon us this coming Saturday, so Rapala is sporting its new billboard advertisement. Judging from USPTO trademark filings, it looks like the cutesy “Bass Friends Forever“ tagline is intended to adorn clothing items too. You will recall that we have consistently covered various iterations of the Rapala billboard… Continue Reading
OfficeMax’s Rubber Band Ball Brand Symbol
Posted in Branding, Marketing, Non-Traditional Trademarks, Sight, TrademarksOfficeMax has been sporting its friendly and colorful rubber band ball brand signal on billboard advertising and delivery trucks for some time, but yesterday is the first time I’ve noticed prominent static use of the bouncy rubber band ball as a non-verbal logo on storefront signage positioned next to the OfficeMax brand name (like the… Continue Reading
Apple Store Design Now a Registered Trademark
Posted in Sight, Trademarks–Catlan McCurdy, Attorney Duets readers everywhere may recall my shock back in June 2011 when I encountered the first Microsoft brick-and-mortar store at the Mall of America. Now, about two years later, the store is still there, located right across the aisle from Apple . The crowd levels in the stores seemed close to the crowd… Continue Reading
The Most Important Shot in Trademark History
Posted in Branding, Famous Marks, Guest Bloggers, Mixed Bag of Nuts, Sight, Trademarks- Draeke Weseman, Weseman Law Office, PLLC Pantone 278: Carolina Blue What I do remember about that evening is that stores for dozens of miles around must have sold out of light blue paint, because nearly everyone had a stash, which was dumped indiscriminately over friends and strangers in a precursor to the Gatorade… Continue Reading
My Namesake Sues To Protect Its Famous Mark
Posted in Branding, Counterfeits, Dilution, False Advertising, Famous Marks, Infringement, Law Suits, Sight, TrademarksCoincidentally (or perhaps by design), Tiffany and Company (“Tiffany”) filed suit on Valentine’s Day against Costco Wholesale Corporation (“Costco”) to protect its trademark with respect to engagement rings. We know from our prior post regarding Tiffany’s amicus brief filed in support of Christian Louboutin that Tiffany actively protects its brand. If you are like me,… Continue Reading
McDonald’s Trade Dress? State Farm is There.
Posted in Advertising, Branding, Dilution, Famous Marks, Food, Infringement, Marketing, Non-Traditional Trademarks, Sight, TrademarksPassing by a roadside billboard recently (below is a miniature version I found in the Minneapolis skyway system), my first thought was, wow, McDonald’s is getting into the juicy lucy business: Until more focus revealed that State Farm Insurance is the one behind the ad. Look familiar? No doubt burgers and car insurance are totally different lines of business and… Continue Reading
The Louboutin Color Trademark Controversy Continues
Posted in Branding, Copyrights, Infringement, Law Suits, Non-Traditional Trademarks, Sight, Trademarks, USPTOWhile watching Lena Dunham stumble in her 6-inch Louboutin red-soled heels during the 70th Annual Golden Globe Awards broadcast, our comments revolved around the fact that her dress was so long, she should have worn slippers instead of stilettos. We believed that Ms. Dunham should have waited to wear the Louboutin shoes until she was wearing… Continue Reading
Inherently Distinctive Product Packaging?
Posted in Branding, International, Marketing, Non-Traditional Trademarks, Product Packaging, Sight, Social Networking, Trademarks, USPTOEarlier this month, we asked whether [yo]gurt(lab) has an inherently distinctive interior restaurant environment? This week, we’re focused on product packaging, and ask whether Spine Vodka has enough meat on the bones to satisfy the trademark test for an inherently distinctive product package design? This little gem of an image surfaced in a LinkedIn discussion where I learned… Continue Reading
Inherently Distinctive Restaurant Interior?
Posted in Branding, Domain Names, Food, Marketing, Non-Traditional Trademarks, Sight, TrademarksWe recently focused our attention on a very unique-looking, dare I say distinctive, retail store exterior design; for a quick reminder, see here. The recent craze for self-serve frozen yogurt shops – where you pay by the ounce (or perhaps, by the pound), has us focused today on a pretty darn unique interior retail environment: This is… Continue Reading
No Plaque on This Scope Bottle Trademark
Posted in Branding, Marketing, Non-Traditional Trademarks, Product Packaging, Sight, Trademarks, TTABWould you place this mouth wash bottle on your bathroom counter or hide it under the counter? The answer to this question, it appears, can have a material impact on whether the shape and design of the bottle functions as a non-traditional trademark. The Procter & Gamble Company created this elegant container design — to counter the out-of-sight-out-of-mind… Continue Reading
Be Mo Like a Brandverb?
Posted in Advertising, Branding, Marketing, Sight, TrademarksThere is a new bank in town, or at least new billboard advertising for a bank I haven’t noticed before now — by the way, I like the color scheme. The logo reminded me of another, at least from a distance, albeit for different services. Putting that issue aside, there are a couple of things… Continue Reading
Tebowing Trademark: Passion or Profit?
Posted in Branding, Guest Bloggers, Idea Protection, Marketing, Mixed Bag of Nuts, Sight, Trademarks—John Reinan, Senior Director at Fast Horse, a Minneapolis marketing agency Tim Tebow was a great college quarterback. But now that he’s in the NFL, he’s joined the ranks of celebrities who are famous mainly for being famous. Example A: “Tebowing,” his signature move. After making a play, the devout Christian often drops to one… Continue Reading
Marketing Pitfall Kills Yellow Color Trademark
Posted in Advertising, Articles, Infringement, Law Suits, Loss of Rights, Marketing, Non-Traditional Trademarks, Sight, Trademarks, USPTOCaution must be exercised in advertising and marketing materials when the brand owner desires ownership of non-traditional trademarks such as product configurations (here and here), trade dress, and single color marks too. In our ongoing effort to raise the awareness of marketing types to pitfalls that can kill non-traditional trademark rights, a recent decision from the Fifth… Continue Reading
Louboutin & Lessons Learned
Posted in Branding, Copyrights, Infringement, Keyword Ads, Law Suits, Marketing, Non-Traditional Trademarks, Search Engines, Sight, Trademarks, USPTOAs promised, here are some further thoughts, lessons learned, and remaining unanswered questions concerning the recent and long-anticipated decision of the Second Circuit Court of Appeals in Christian Louboutin S.A. v. Yves Saint Laurent Am. Holding, Inc. Lessons Learned for Marketing Types: Single color trademarks may be owned, registered, and protected when they are distinctive and… Continue Reading
Cease and Desist, Please
Posted in Branding, Famous Marks, Guest Bloggers, Infringement, Marketing, Mixed Bag of Nuts, Sight, Trademark Bullying, Trademarks- Brent Carlson-Lee, President, Open Door Foods If you’re anything like me, you occasionally muse about being a celebrity. If I were a movie star, I’d gladly sign autographs – even while at a restaurant with my family. If I were the author of the hottest business book on the New York Times Best Sellers… Continue Reading
Louboutin Wins Second Circuit Appeal, Sort Of . . . .
Posted in Branding, Infringement, Law Suits, Marketing, Non-Traditional Trademarks, Sight, Trademarks, USPTOAt long last, here is a pdf link to the decision, and here is the Second Circuit Court of Appeals summary in a nutshell: “We conclude that the District Court’s holding that a single color can never serve as a trademark in the fashion industry, Christian Louboutin S.A. v. Yves Saint Laurent Am., Inc., 778… Continue Reading
Where there’s little light, we find big design hope
Posted in Branding, Famous Marks, Guest Bloggers, Mixed Bag of Nuts, Sight, Trademarks- Aaron Keller, Managing Principal, Capsule Whether it’s a natural tendency to write the underdog story or just a desire to see big get crushed by little, we tend to favor the small over the large. The economics of change have provided plenty of stories for us and plenty of small heroes to back. For… Continue Reading
World’s Shortest Trademark Cat Fight?
Posted in Branding, Famous Marks, Infringement, International, Law Suits, Marketing, Non-Traditional Trademarks, Sight, TrademarksGerman-based Puma S.E. brought a trademark infringement lawsuit — based on the similarity of the cat logos — against Minnesota-based Arctic Cat, in the Northern District of Illinois at the end of last year (copy of complaint is here). As we have written about before, sometimes the substance and merits of a trademark fight can… Continue Reading
DIY Louboutin: A Can of Red Paint and $30 Pumps
Posted in Sight, Trademarks–Catlan McCurdy, Attorney Over at DuetsBlog, we have been anxiously awaiting the Second Circuit’s decision in Christian Louboutin v. Yves Saint Laurent. It was predicted that a decision would be made by early Spring 2012. Meanwhile, the French have already made their decision and moved on, covered by our own Tiffany Blofield here. The British,… Continue Reading
Will the Twitter Bird Fly Alone Some Day?
Posted in Branding, Famous Marks, Marketing, Non-Traditional Trademarks, Sight, Social Networking, TrademarksLast month William Lozito, over at Name Wire: The Product Naming Blog, reported on Twitter’s new bird logo, and the multitude of don’ts associated with the launch of it. Having so many don’ts seems a bit contrary to Twitter’s prior rather lax or laissez-faire approach to trademark enforcement,… Continue Reading
Don’t Be A Clown, Bro: Trademark Your Catch Phrase (and put it to good use)
Posted in Advertising, Branding, Guest Bloggers, Marketing, Mixed Bag of Nuts, Sight, Trademarks, USPTO- Jonathan Applebaum, Winthrop & Weinstine, P.A. While major league baseball players are not known for their creative celebrations, Washington Nationals’ rookie phenom Bryce Harper deserves praise for his legal resourcefulness after dismissing a celebration-related question from a Toronto reporter following the Nationals 4-2 victory over the Toronto Blue Jays on June 12, 2012. The… Continue Reading
Seeing Orange in the Construction Space
Posted in Advertising, Branding, Infringement, Law Suits, Marketing, Non-Traditional Trademarks, Sight, TrademarksLittle did I know when I was writing What’s in an Orange-Colored Home Improvement Business Name? — that two days later, orange-color marks would be asserted in a trademark infringement lawsuit filed in Minnesota federal district court over competing building construction services: Cedar Valley Exteriors, Inc. v. JNS Builders LLC. A copy of the complaint… Continue Reading






