Trademark enforcement against infringing domains on the Internet is frequently likened to playing Whac-A-Mole. Just as soon as you eliminate one, up pops another, and another, etc.

Dan’s post from last week on the most recent land rush on the Internet — with the creation of almost infinite Internet real estate — may be a 

–Susan Perera, Attorney

Earlier this week ICANN (the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers) approved a major change to top-level Internet domains (TLDs).

Soon we will no longer be limited to the standard 22 top-level domains including .com, .org, and .net. In fact, your brand could soon be its own top-level domain.  For

–Dan Kelly, Attorney

Last week, I went to the Internet to look up some information.  I opened the browser and hastily typed “” in the address bar and was met with this page:

I stared at it for several seconds, during many of which I seriously thought that Wikipedia had updated its home landing page and puzzle-globe design.  The Google and Ebay search bars eventually convinced me that I was in the wrong place, and after staring at the banner for several more seconds, I realized that I had directly navigated not to (which lands at, but instead to “,” just like I typed, omitting the first “i.”

Typical typosquatters use pay-per-click pages (examples here) to monetize their typo domain names, which is bad enough.  The typosquatter is using a look-alike of a registered trademark that, at least for me, creates confusion, which elevates the issue.  It is no longer “mere” typosquatting, but this may very well be flat out trademark infringement.

Typosquatting profits from traffic, and it does not discriminate as to whether the traffic is generated from a domain held by a for-profit company or one held by a not-for-profit company.  The difference in battling the beast is that a for-profit company often has a larger budget to combat the problem.  Unless or until better tools are developed to battle typosquatting on the back end, the best defense remains a good offense, and all the more for non-profits.  If you are planning to start a non-profit with a heavy web presence, make sure that your budget includes the purchase and holding of as many typographical variants of central domains as are feasible to purchase.

An image of the Wikipedia landing page is below the jump for comparison.Continue Reading Typosquatting: Not Just a For-Profit Problem

We thought we had arrived when DuetsBlog made a listing of the Top 100 Branding Blogs, and it also was kind of nice when the DuetsBlog mark became federally registered, but now it appears we have reached yet another level of notoriety, appreciation, and respect altogether, as DuetsBlog is now receiving the most thoughtful of email solicitations all the

An interesting trademark case recently was filed in federal district court in Minnesota, Chevron Intellectual Property LLC et al v. MDW Equity Partners, LLC, a pdf copy of the complaint here.

As beleaguered BP‘s once valuable goodwill and reputation continues to flounder in the court of public opinion with the tragic gulf oil spill