The popular UGG® branded sheepskin boots are at the heart of a dispute in the Northern District of Illinois. Deckers Outdoor Corp. (“Deckers”) owns 29 federal registrations for the trademark UGG in connection with numerous goods and services, including footwear, clothing, wallets, passport covers, plush toys and retail store services. The company also has four
fashion
Gucci: The Other Stripe Mark
Normally when we talk about stripes trademarks , we’re talking about iconic sportswear brand adidas. An avid litigant with respect to use of “three stripe” designs on footwear and clothing, adidas is a regular feature here at DuetsBlog, where we have discussed disputes with lululemon, Puma, and retail store Forever 21. But…
Trendy Shoemaker Cannot Slay the Fashion King
Plaintiff LVL XIII Brands Inc. (“LVL XIII”) must not have heard of the old saying: “Never strike a king unless you are sure you shall kill him.” The New York start-up sneaker company decided to take on fashion king Louis Vuitton over a metal plate attached to high-end men’s sneakers. LVL XIII’s claims were dismissed last week on summary judgment in a 107 page opinion.
Hopefully, Plaintiff LVL XIII fared better last week with its presentation during New York Fashion Week show pictured above. You may have heard of LVL XIII sneakers, because famous people such as Jason Derulo and Chris Brown have touted the sneakers on television and in magazines.
In the lawsuit, Plaintiff alleged that Louis Vuitton was engaged in trademark infringement and unfair competition by using its rectangular metal toe plate. Examples of the toe plates at the heart of the dispute are depicted below.
The Court began its analysis of the motion for summary judgment by explaining that for a trademark to have protection, it must be “distinctive.” An “inherently distinctive” trademark is one in which “intrinsic nature serves to identify a particular source.” Plaintiff’s mark did not meet this standard. Accordingly, the Court had to turn to whether the mark had “acquired distinctiveness” by achieving “secondary meaning” among the relevant consumers. This means that “in the minds of the public, the primary significance of a product feature is to identify the source (e.g., LVL XIII) rather than the product itself (e.g. the sneaker toe patch).
Continue Reading Trendy Shoemaker Cannot Slay the Fashion King
What Black Mamba, Make America Great Again, and Netflix Fast all have in common
– Jason Voiovich, Chief Customer Officer, Logic PD
It’s not a new reality show. Let’s take that off the table straight away. That said, one could be forgiven this year (of all years) for imagining a scenario in which retired basketball great Kobe Bryant teamed up with not-so-retired real estate sort-of great Donald Trump to…
Fly the Tasty Skies
– Nancy Friedman, Wordworking
In mid-June JetBlue, which since its first flights in 2000 had been a single-class “value” airline, introduced its version of first-class service. To signal this departure—forgive the pun—it didn’t give the service a category name such as JetBlue Business. Nor did it follow its own naming conventions and build on the…
Leaning In on SATURDAY: The Trademark Gender Gap
Tim’s post last week on the dispute between Victoria’s Secret PINK (a women’s lingerie and loungewear line) & Thomas Pink (predominantly known for its menswear line) reminded me of a Women’s Wear Daily article that I read regarding a trademark dispute involving Kate Spade New York’s new KATE SPADE SATURDAY brand, a more casual womenswear…
Does this Pink clash with my Pink?
Since May of 2013, a legal battle has been brewing between two fashion industry giants: Victoria’s Secret and Thomas Pink (owned by Louis Vuitton). Below are pictures of storefronts for the two companies:
Thomas Pink began as a U.K. company and is known for its menswear, primarily shirts, ties, and other dress clothes. Thomas Pink…
Louboutin Red-Sole & Surrounding Contrast: An Implied Trademark Limitation
The Louboutin lacquered red sole trademark is the subject of great debate in the trademark world, fashion industry, popular news media, and among law school academics and friends of the court.
I’m just not seeing it. I really don’t see a viable trademark claim here for Louboutin. Not for the reasons…
The Fashion Bill Slowly Creeps Towards Becoming a Law
–Catlan McCurdy, Attorney
Above, my favorite latest designer ripoff – the Kate Middleton wedding dress. A cheaper version of the Alexander McQueen designer’s, Sara Burton, vision, so now every bride can feel like a princess… (photo credit to Mirror.co.uk)
With New York Fashion Week nearing its end, and the whirl of Forever 21’s sewing machines…
Ralph Lauren’s New Fall Focus: Mexican Drug Traffickers?
–Catlan McCurdy, Attorney
If the thousands of ads I have seen over the years have taught me anything, it is that the words “Ralph Lauren” and “drug traffickers” don’t belong in the same sentence. According to ad campaigns, upon hearing “Ralph Lauren” we are instead supposed to imagine clean-shaven, chiseled young men with their equally…